Black Missouri Tigers players to strike over racial harassment on campus – Guardian Sport Sunday 8 November 2015 00.14 EST

  • Athletes call for the resignation of university president
  • Legion of Black Collegians put out message of discontent
University of Missouri

Black players from the Missouri Tigers football team say they will not participate in team activities until the university president, Tim Wolfe, resigns.

There have been several incidents of racial harassment in recent weeks on the college campus and Wolfe has come under criticism for his handling of the situation. In one recent incident, excrement in the shape of a swastika was smeared on a dormitory wall while other students have complained that racist slurs are common at the university. Jonathan Butler, a black graduate student at the college, is currently on hunger strike over the issue.

On Saturday night, the Legion of Black Collegians posted a message on Twitter calling for Wolfe to resign.

“The athletes of color on the University of Missouri football team truly believe ‘injustice Anywhere is a threat to Justice Everywhere,’” the tweet said. “We will no longer participate in any football related activities until President Tim Wolfe resigns or is removed due to his negligence toward marginalized students’ experiences. WE ARE UNITED!!!!!”

Athletes from the team, including star running back Russell Hanbrough, featured in a photo accompanying the tweet.

Article continues:




Poker is gambling. Everyone knows that. But if poker is a game of “chance,” then why are some people so much better at it than others? For daily fantasy sports sites, that fine line between games of skill and games of chance could determine whether they stay in business.

Over the past week, regulators and law enforcement have taken significant interest in the heavily advertised and nominally regulated industry. The Justice Department and the FBI are investigating whether daily fantasy sports sites violate federal law. Nevada regulators decided that such sites constitute gambling and told them to cease operation until they secured proper licenses. In Florida, prosecutors convened a grand jury to investigate their legality. Then there’s the New York Attorney General’s inquiry, not to mention a class-action suit filed in federal court against the two biggest operators, DraftKings and FanDuel.

Daily fantasy sports sites DraftKings and FanDuel, as we’ve written, have always operated in murky territory. But they’ve been exposed to harsh light following revelations that a DraftKings employee inadvertently released company data on player lineups before the third week of NFL games. That same week, he won $350,000 at FanDuel, raising suspicions that he used insider knowledge to cash in.

Daily fantasy sites operate under an exemption to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. The law effectively bans online gambling in the US by prohibiting banks and credit card companies from transferring money to online gambling sites. Congress made an exemption for fantasy sports sites, which lawmakers deemed a “game of skill and not chance.”  The thing is, most games involve skill and chance. There’s no catch-all test to quantify how much skill and how much chance are involved in a particular game—and no legal standard that identifies a threshold at which gaming becomes gambling.

‘Games of Skill and Not Chance’

The actual language of the law singles out fantasy sports and says all winning outcomes in such games “reflect the relative knowledge and skill of the participants” and are “determined predominantly by accumulated statistical results of the performance of [athletes] in multiple real-world sporting.”

This is the carve-out often bandied about as the reason why the fantasy sports industry has so far escaped regulation. When lawmakers passed the in 2006, fantasy sports were predominantly played in small groups among friends. That changed radically about a year later, when daily fantasy sports emerged. The game migrated online, where anyone could join in. Players could create multiple lineups and play daily. Some players use custom-built models and computer software to crunch data and improve their odds.

Article continues:

The Deals That Made Daily Fantasy Take Off – By Matthew Futterman and  Sharon Terlep Oct. 16, 2015 8:55 p.m. ET

Federal probes of FanDuel and DraftKings pose this question: How did they get so big?

FanDuel and DraftKings control some 95% of the North American daily-fantasy-sports market, spending lavishly on ads and awards.

FanDuel and DraftKings control some 95% of the North American daily-fantasy-sports market, spending lavishly on ads and awards. Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

FanDuel and DraftKings, intense competitors that control some 95% of the North American daily-fantasy-sports market, have made a splash in recent months with lavish spending on advertisements and cash awards for the winners of their contests.

But with the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation opening probes this week into the business model of these companies, and after gaming regulators in Nevada ordered the sites to cease operations in their state, the question is this: Where did these troubled companies come from, and how did they get so big so fast?

FanDuel says it will dole out $2 billion in prizes this year. DraftKings has pledged to give away at least $1 billion. The companies are valued at $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.

New-York based Fanduel, which was early to the market in 2009 and long the dominant player, started with a relatively muted approach. It gave fantasy-sports players a chance to compete for prizes by building virtual teams of athletes. In 2013, it raised $11 million in financing from venture-capital companies. The following year it raised another $70 million.

But what pushed the business to its current frenzied level was the fast rise of Boston-based DraftKings, founded in 2012, which adopted a more aggressive fundraising and marketing posture and quickly came to rival FanDuel in size and profile.

Why Ticket Brokers Hate the Miami Dolphins – By SHARON TERLEP Oct. 1, 2015 2:20 p.m. ET

In bid to control the resale market, team owner Stephen Ross is investing in one brokerage—while cutting off others

A general view of Sun Life Stadium during a game between the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills on Sept. 27.

A general view of Sun Life Stadium during a game between the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills on Sept. 27. Photo: Getty ImagesThe Miami Dolphins haven’t had much luck on the football field this season. But the team’s owner has vaulted to the top of the NFL in another respect: rewriting the rules of ticket scalping. 

In September, the Dolphins went public with a plan to significantly curtail the number of tickets it sells to independent brokers. The goal, the team said, was to make sure fewer tickets ended up being sold to fans of visiting teams. But according to one broker who was cut off, the Dolphins gave a big chunk of these tickets to one firm in particular: Atlanta-based PrimeSport Inc., which was acquired in February by an investor group that includes Dolphins owner Stephen Ross.

In some cases, PrimeSport is selling Dolphins tickets for well more than their face value. For a Jan. 3 matchup with the New England Patriots, the Dolphins’ official website has offered a pair of lower-bowl seats for $421 apiece. On PrimeSport’s site, seats one row behind in the same section cost $636—a 51% markup. For Miami’s Nov. 2 matchup with the Dallas Cowboys, PrimeSport has listed more than 480 tickets at prices of up to $1,200 each. It is not clear whether these tickets came from the Dolphins or another source.

Miami ticket broker Gus Rodriguez said he used to buy about $1 million of Dolphins tickets every year. The team cut his supply back last season, he said, and wouldn’t sell to him at all this year. Rodriguez said that when he pressed the team to explain, he got a call from Nick Forro, the Dolphins’ vice president of ticket sales. “He said, ‘We have a company that our owner owns and we have to do business with them,’” Rodriguez said. “It’s the first time I ever head an executive from a team say, ‘We can’t sell you tickets because we have our own secondary ticket business.”

‘It’s the first time I ever head an executive from a team say, “We can’t sell you tickets because we have our own secondary ticket business.”’

—Miami ticket broker Gus Rodriguez

A team spokesman denied that Forro at any time asserted that the team would only do business with PrimeSport. The Dolphins declined to make Forro available for comment.

In an interview, Ross, the Dolphins owner, said the Dolphins decided to give so much business to PrimeSport because it is a good broker that focuses primarily on packages that include travel and hospitality. “It’s the best one of all of them,” he said. Ross said his stake in PrimeSport, which is held by RSE Ventures, a firm he co-founded, is “very, very small.” People familiar with the deal said it is less than 2%. Ross said he does not believe that the arrangement, in which he earns a small piece of the profits from a company that scalps his team’s tickets, raises any conflict-of-interest issues.

An NFL spokesman said the league office was aware of the investment and had no issues with it.

Beyond Brady – By Rob Hamilton SEPT. 4 2015 3:48 PM

 Tom Brady after the 2015 AFC championship game, site of Deflategate, Jan. 18, 2015. Photo by Elsa/Getty Images

Tom Brady after the 2015 AFC championship game, site of Deflategate, Jan. 18, 2015.
Photo by Elsa/Getty Images

When Judge Richard Berman vacated Tom Brady’s four-game suspension for his alleged role in Deflategate, Berman not only handed the NFL a high-profile legal defeat, but he established the courthouse as the most viable option for players hoping to challenge the league’s policies. It’s a sign that the league must reform or face major—and embarrassing—ramifications for its disciplinary actions.

When allegations arose that the Patriots had illegally deflated game balls in the AFC championship game, the NFL hired Ted Wells to conduct an independent investigation. The resulting Wells Report concluded that it was “more probable than not” that Tom Brady “was at least generally aware” of the ball-deflation scheme, prompting NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to suspend Brady for four games. Brady appealed the punishment, and the matter went to arbitration. Goodell, serving as arbitrator, upheld the suspension and proclaimed that Brady “knew about, approved of, consented to, and provided inducements and rewards in support of” the deflation scheme.

The league’s response to Deflategate was reminiscent of its response to the Miami Dolphins bullying scandal in 2013. Allegations arose that Dolphins players had bullied offensive lineman Jonathan Martin to the point of a breakdown. (Martin briefly checked himself into the hospital before leaving the team.) The league commissioned an independent investigation, also headed by Wells, which produced a 144-page report detailing the torment heaped upon Martin by his teammates. It vilified lineman Richie Incognito, who would not find work in 2014, and led to the firing of offensive line coach Jim Turner. The report served as some rare good publicity for the commissioner’s office.

Article continues:

Football, brain injuries and right-wing denial: The paranoid he-man propaganda that insists the game is safer than ever – STEVE ALMOND MONDAY, AUG 24, 2015 03:59 PM PDT

The toxic pro-masculinity camp insists that mere “bumps and bruises” are the sport’s biggest dangers

Football, brain injuries and right-wing denial: The paranoid he-man propaganda that insists the game is safer than ever

Last week, I was asked to appear on “Outside the Lines,” ESPN’s flagship news magazine, to discuss what football people tend to refer to, somewhat squeamishly, as “the Chris Borland situation.”

Last March Borland, a star linebacker for the San Francisco 49ers, shocked the sports world by announcing that he was quitting the game after just one season, because he feared he might suffer brain damage if he continued to play.

This was not exactly a far-fetched notion, given that the NFL itself had estimated—after years of denying any link between football and brain disease—that up to 30 percent of their former players would suffer from cognitive ailments such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.

When I arrived at the studio, I was told I should be ready to discuss the “meaning” of the Chris Borland situation, which did not strike me as particularly elusive. When your employer announces in federal court documents that you have a one in three chance of being neurologically disabled in the course of doing your job, the smart money is on retiring.

Still, I was excited to record the episode because “Outside the Lines” is easily the most intelligent and journalistically sophisticated show within the vast and ever-expanding kingdom of ESPN. The program eschews bombastic punditry and slavish promotion (cue the highlight porn) in favor of in-depth reporting and conversation.

Article continues:



Screen Shot 2015-08-02 at Aug 2, 2015 11.46



Mike Yard and Holly Walker react to the killing of a famous African lion, and Larry discusses big-game hunting with Rory Albanese, Baratunde Thurston and Bobcat Goldthwait. (21:30)

NFL patriotism for profit – By Eddie Zipperer, June 11, 2015, 07:00 am

Remember that great movie where the hunky man and beautiful woman seemed destined to be together until circumstances tore them asunder? But, when all seemed lost, they found their way back to each other? Love reigned triumphant. Hearts swelled to their popping points with rainbows and unicorns.

What if I told you that movie wasn’t about the triumphant nature of love at all? It was really about a gaggle of rich Hollywood folks lining their already well-lined pockets! Would it cheapen that feeling? Erase it entirely?

It would for Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who sponsored an amendment blocking the Pentagon from spending taxpayer funds to honor American troops at sporting events. After all, this isn’t Hollywood money that’s being spent on these ceremonies; this is the most sacred of all money: taxpayer money.

That’s right — when you’re watching the armed forces being honored before your favorite team plays, you’re watching a commercial paid for by the Department of Defense (DOD).

Gut reaction: We’ve all been duped! Propagandized! Evil owners are profiting off our men and women in uniform!

Take one of those deep yoga breaths. Let reason seep in, and realize that this isn’t seedy, scandalous or even newsworthy.

If those ceremonies made you feel pride in our military men and women, the money exchanged shouldn’t cheapen it. That feeling is real. They’re not making up stories about heroic acts that never happened or reuniting child actors with fake soldier parents. Those are the real men and women who’ve served honorably for our country.

McCain said of the practice, “I and so many other Americans were shocked and disappointed to learn that several NFL teams weren’t sponsoring these activities out of the goodness of their own hearts.”


Article continues:

NFL Player Announces He’s Sitting Out Next Season ‘I Just Want To Live A Long, Healthy Life’ – BY CARIMAH TOWNES POSTED ON JUNE 6, 2015 AT 11:30 AM

San Francisco 49ers offensive tackle Anthony Davis in a preseason NFL Football game in San Francisco, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010. CREDIT: AP PHOTO/MARCIO JOSE SANCHEZ

San Francisco 49ers offensive tackle Anthony Davis in a preseason NFL Football game in San Francisco, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010.

San Francisco 49ers offensive tackle Anthony Davis in a preseason NFL Football game in San Francisco, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010.

Anthony Davis, a 25-year-old linebacker for the San Francisco 49ers, announced Friday that he’ll be sitting out the next football season in order to heal his body.

“After a few years of thought, I’ve decided it will be best for me to take a year or so away from the NFL. This will be a time for me to allow my Brain and Body a chance to heal. I know many won’t understand my decision, that’s ok,” Davis said in an official statement obtained by ESPN sports writer Adam Schefter. “Im [sic] simply doing what’s best for my body as well as my mental health at this time in my life.”

Following the announcement, reported Davis will return the $4.66 million bonus money he received upon signing his contract.

With his temporary retirement, Davis joins a growing list of football players putting their careers on hold for precautionary reasons, in spite of the glorification of athletes who play through the pain. In March, 24-year-old Chris Borland, another 49ers linebacker, decided to retire as a “proactive” measure — one year after joining the league.

“I’m concerned that if you wait ’til you have symptoms, it’s too late. … There are a lot of unknowns. I can’t claim that X will happen. I just want to live a long, healthy life, and I don’t want to have any neurological diseases or die younger than I would otherwise,” he said. A University of Michigan lineman bowed out two weeks later, sharing similar concerns.

Extensive research indicates football players are likely to face serious health consequences down the road. For example, the U.S. government concluded former NFL players are four times more likely to die from brain diseases, such as Alzheimers and ALS, than the rest of the population. Another studyindicates that multiple concussions sustained during NFL players’ careers can lead to depression.

Back in 2013, after thousands of former football players filed a lawsuit against the NFL for downplaying concussions and brain injuries, the league agreed to compensate former players for their injuries and provide thorough medical examinations. But the $765 million settlement’s terms provided that the NFL did not have to publicly implicate itself for minimizing the risks of long-term brain trauma.

Concern about sports-related brain injuries isn’t limited to the NFL. The National Hockey League (NHL) is also dealing with concussion-related lawsuits, involving former hockey players who’ve suffered from brain diseases and trauma. Concussions are routinely ignored in the soccer world as well. And the NCAA was accused in a 2013 lawsuit of intentionally overlooking college athletes’ concussions. As for basketball, an NBA player blacked out on the court last year, but opted to stay in the game. However, the league has adopted a proactive policy to deal with athletes’ concussions.

Article continues: