Ex-CIA Officer Tries to Clear Her Name (Extra Scene from ‘The Italian Job’) – Vice News Published on Nov 10, 2015

Sabrina De Sousa is one of nearly two-dozen CIA officers who was prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced by Italian courts in absentia in 2009 for the role she allegedly played in the rendition of a radical cleric named Abu Omar. It was the first and only criminal prosecution that has ever taken place related to the CIA’s rendition program, which involved more than 100 suspected terrorists and the assistance of dozens of European countries.

But De Sousa, a dual US and Portuguese citizen, said she had nothing to do with the cleric’s abduction and has been wrongly accused. For the past decade, she has been on a global quest to clear her name. VICE News met up with De Sousa in Lisbon, Portugal–and other key figures connected to the case–for an exclusive interview about the steps she’s now taking in an effort to hold the CIA accountable for one of the most notorious counterterrorism operations in the history of the agency.

In this extra scene, Sabrina De Sousa explains how she’s used the Freedom of Information Act to help further her defense.

Watch the VICE News Interview with Michael Morell – http://bit.ly/1Nv6SMJ

VW Screwed Its Dealers, Too – w JORDAN GOLSON.: 10.07.15. 7:36 PM

Most of the immediate fallout from the Volkswagen emissions scandal has focused on customers (what does this mean for their cars?), Volkswagen itself (how much will this cost the company?), and the environment (just how much extra smog are we dealing with?).

Those valid concerns, though, ignore a key player: dealers. Most car buyers never deal with corporate offices. They buy and service cars at independent, franchise dealerships. Dealers were as surprised as anyone by the diesel deception from Wolfsburg, and could be even more screwed than VW owners themselves.

Last month, Volkswagen admitted that it had sold more than 10 million diesel-powered cars with software designed to bypass emissions testing requirements. The manufacturer is now on the hook for billions in fines (up to $18 billion in the US alone) and fixes to customer cars, including possibly buying back the cars in question. On Wednesday, the company announced basic plans for to recall and “repair” all the vehicles, starting early next year.

“This was a massive fraud,” says Steve Kalafer, chairman of the Flemington Car & Truck Country family of dealerships in New Jersey. “If our employees deceived Volkswagen in the warranty repair of a vehicle, or if a salesman claimed an incentive they weren’t entitled to, VW would have the right and probably would terminate our business relationship with them without any compensation … If we did it, we would lose our business. And, if it were a large enough fraud, presumably they would turn it over to the local prosecutor.”

This isn’t something dealers could have planned for. You know a customer or employee might try to pull something underhanded, that’s why you get corporate liability insurance. But no one expects a massive company like Volkswagen to blatantly defraud its customers and business partners. Not like this. Not on such a massive scale. On a dollar-for-dollar basis, this could end up dwarfing Bernie Madoff.

Kalafer says his business will survive, since he sells plenty of non-VW cars. But there are hundreds of Volkswagen dealers in the US, many of them family-owned, single-marque shops. Those are the ones most at risk. VW has guaranteed the payout of sales incentives regardless of the number of cars sold, and handed out small payments to dealerships. But they are losing money every day.

Volkswagen dealers have spent millions over the past few years improving their showrooms in anticipation of new models designed to reinvigorate the brand. Back in January, VW said it was planning to add an additional 100 dealerships to the 650 currently in the US to support a hoped-for increase in sales. Those millions of dollars in new and upgraded service departments, seating areas, parking lots, computer systems, and employees are all potentially in jeopardy.

Article continues:


Storm of Criticism Engulfs DraftKings, FanDuel – By Sarah E. Needleman Oct. 6, 2015 12:57 a.m. ET

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at Oct 6, 2015 1.52

Fantasy sports sites DraftKings and FanDuel are under scrutiny after a DraftKings worker won $350,000 in a FanDuel contest, raising questions about fairness and the lack of regulation. WSJ’s Sarah Needleman explains on Lunch Break With Tanya Rivero. Photo: AP

A storm of online criticism has roiled the two largest fantasy-sports companies in North America, casting a spotlight on an industry already under scrutiny for lacking government oversight.

Billion-dollar startups FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings Inc. run online contests in which people draft virtual teams of professional athletes and compete against each other based on the athletes’ real-world performances.

A number of posts on fantasy-sports sites such as RotoGrinders criticized the companies for unfair practices after last week’s admission by a DraftKings employee that he prematurely released data about the site’s biggest contest before some of the National Football League games involved in it had started.

The venture-backed companies released joint statements Monday asserting that they have “strong policies in place” to ensure proper handling of company data.

DraftKings employee Ethan Haskell said on a message board that by accident he prematurely published data to the company’s blog from the lineups of players submitted to the DraftKings site for its Millionaire Maker contest.

“I’ve fixed the error and we’ll be putting checks in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again,” Mr. Haskell wrote on RotoGrinders. “I was the only person with this data and as a DK employee, am not allowed to play on the site. 100% my fault and I apologize for any issues.”


Article continues:


Volkswagen Emissions Investigation Zeroes In on Two Engineers – By WILLIAM BOSTON Updated Oct. 5, 2015 4:10 a.m. ET

Company investigation focuses on two men elevated after Winterkorn was made CEO

Ulrich Hackenberg and Wolfgang Hatz, among the engineers suspended in the investigation of the VW emissions cheating scandal, are viewed as two of the best and brightest engineers in German industry. Above, a VW factory in Chengdu, China.

Ulrich Hackenberg and Wolfgang Hatz, among the engineers suspended in the investigation of the VW emissions cheating scandal, are viewed as two of the best and brightest engineers in German industry. Above, a VW factory in Chengdu, China. P`


WOLFSBURG, Germany—Two top Volkswagen engineers who found they couldn’t deliver as promised a clean diesel engine for the U.S. market are at the center of a company probe into the installation of engine software designed to fool regulators, according to people familiar with the matter.

The two men, Ulrich Hackenberg, Audi ’s chief engineer, and Wolfgang Hatz,developer of Porsche’s winning Le Mans racing engines, were among the engineers suspended in the investigation of the emissions cheating scandal that sank the company’s market value by 43% since Sept. 18 and triggered a world-wide recall to refit the engines to meet clear-air standards, these people said.

Messrs. Hackenberg and Hatz, who didn’t respond to requests for comment, are viewed as two of the best and brightest engineers in German industry. They were put in charge of research and development at the Volkswagen group shortly after Martin Winterkorn became chief executive in January 2007. Mr. Winterkorn, who resigned over the scandal, couldn’t be reached for comment.

The company has acknowledged that managers, struggling to meet U.S. sales targets, masked the emissions of new-car engines to sell so-called clean diesel technology to skeptical American consumers. The car maker said as many as 11 million vehicles carried a “defeat device,” software that reduces tailpipe emissions only when the car is being tested, not on the road.

Several countries have since blocked sales of certain VW vehicles, and regulators are considering steps to tighten emissions standards for diesel engines.

The details haven’t been made public, but Volkswagen’s investigation is focused on Messrs. Hackenberg and Hatz, Mr. Winterkorn’s top aides during his tenure at Audi, as well as Heinz-Jakob Neusser, head of development at the VW brand, people familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Neusser, also suspended, joined VW from Porsche in 2011, long after the diesel engines began production. He declined to comment.

Disclosure of the scam by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last month unleashed criminal investigations of Volkswagen and its management in the U.S. and Europe, and threatened to bury the company in shareholder and customer lawsuits for years.

“Our company was dishonest with the EPA, and the California Air Resources Board, and with all of you,” Michael Horn, head of Volkswagen of America, told dealers last month in New York City. “We’ve totally screwed up.”

For years, Volkswagen sought a triumph in the U.S. As part of an expansion of the company to sell at least 10 million cars a year by 2018, Mr. Winterkorn’s strategy was to be a leader in the world’s three biggest markets.

The History of Volkswagen, ‘The People’s Car’

Volkswagen has always been more than a car. It occupies a special place in German society. WSJ’s Dipti Kapadia goes through some of the iconic moments for the German auto maker, now caught in a scandal over emissions. Photo: Getty Images

Under Mr. Winterkorn, Volkswagen became the biggest foreign car maker in China. In Europe, one in every four cars is now sold by one of Volkswagen’s eight car brands: VW; premium car maker Audi; sports car brand Porsche; Czech car maker Skoda; Spanish auto maker SEAT; and ultraluxury brands Bentley and Lamborghini.

VW hit its 10 million global target in 2014—four years earlier than planned—and passed Toyota Motor Co. and General Motors Co. to take the top spot in the first half of this year. But to dominate the global market it needed to increase U.S. sales.

Mr. Winterkorn gave U.S. executives a goal of more than tripling annual sales, to at least 800,000 vehicles, in a 10-year plan he set in 2008.

Wolfgang Hatz, above, and Ulrich Hackenberg were put in charge of research and development at the Volkswagen group shortly after Martin Winterkorn became CEO in 2007.ENLARGE
Wolfgang Hatz, above, and Ulrich Hackenberg were put in charge of research and development at the Volkswagen group shortly after Martin Winterkorn became CEO in 2007. Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg News

While popular in Germany, diesel-engine vehicles made up just 5% of the U.S. car market in 2007, when Mr. Winterkorn left Audi to be VW’s CEO. Seeing this as an advantage, diesel became the centerpiece of the U.S. campaign.

Volkswagen pitched U.S. buyers a powerful car with German engineering that met standards on tailpipe emissions by burning high-performance “clean diesel” fuel.

At Volkswagen headquarters in December, Mr. Winterkorn stood in a top-secret showroom known informally as Valhalla and leaned across the hood of a prototype sport-utility vehicle, the CrossBlue, to be built in Chattanooga, Tenn. One version was to have included the clean-diesel engine technology.

“The Yanks like things big,” he quipped to The Wall Street Journal about the vehicle.

The company’s clean-diesel strategy began a decade ago, when the Volkswagen brand was run by Wolfgang Bernhard, who was poached from rival Daimler AG by Bernd Pischetsrieder, Volkswagen CEO at the time. Mr. Bernhard set out to build a new diesel engine for the U.S. market, named the EA 189. Mr. Bernhard and Mr. Pischetsrieder last month issued a joint public statement “dismissing in the strongest possible terms” any connection with the emissions cheating scandal related to the EA 189.

Article continues:


On The Line: Avi Asher-Schapiro on Cop Watch – Vice News Published on Sep 28, 2015

VICE News journalist Avi Asher-Schapiro (https://twitter.com/aaschapiro) joined On The Line to discuss his new piece about Cop Watch.

Over the past year-and-a-half, police violence in places like New York, Baltimore, and Ferguson grabbed headlines, sparked mass protest, and drove down public confidence in law enforcement to a 22 year low. In response, people across the country have been fashioning makeshift uniforms, arming themselves with cameras, and patrolling streets to document police misconduct. It’s an explosion of a movement that has been around for many years. This is Copwatch.

Read: Walking the Beat With Copwatch, the People Who Police the Police – http://bit.ly/1V8w12t

Red Cross Effort to Shut Down Inquiry Fails; Report Calls for Outside Oversight – LAURA SULLIVAN JUSTIN ELLIOTT SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 5:01 AM ET

The American Red Cross is facing new criticism today as government investigators and a congressman call for independent oversight over the long-venerated charity.

Federal legislation is being unveiled that would force the Red Cross to open its books and operations to outside scrutiny – something it has repeatedly resisted.

The proposed American Red Cross Sunshine Act comes in response to a report by the Government Accountability Office, also being released today, that finds oversight of the charity lacking and recommends that Congress find a way to fill the gap.

The GAO inquiry cites reporting by NPR and ProPublica about the Red Cross’ failures during Superstorm Sandy and misleading statements by CEO Gail McGovern about how the group has spent hundreds of millions of donated dollars.

Investigators concluded that the Red Cross needs “regular, external, independent and publicly disseminated evaluations.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, is introducing the bill which he says he hopes will make that possible. The legislation calls for regular audits from the Departments of Homeland Security and Treasury, and USAID. It also says the Red Cross must open its books and cooperate with all future GAO investigations.

Thompson said that part is especially important because he says the Red Cross did not fully cooperate with this GAO inquiry which began 18 months ago.

“There was initial pushback from the standpoint of getting information,” Thompson said in an interview. Then, he says, the situation got worse.

Last summer, he says, he received a letter from Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern. She wrote to Thompson, ranking member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, and asked him to “end the GAO inquiry,” according to a copy of the letter obtained by NPR and ProPublica. McGovern gave the congressman her private cell phone number and asked that he not communicate with her in writing.


Article continues:


Government-backed egg lobby tried to crack food startup, emails show – Sam Thielman and Dominic Rushe Wednesday 2 September 2015 14.49 EDT

USDA official joined American Egg Board in planning to ruin Hampton Creek, Silicon Valley firm that created plant-based egg alternative and Just Mayo

The American Egg Board provided 14,000 eggs for the annual White House Easter egg roll this year.

A US government-appointed agricultural body tried to crush a Silicon Valley food startup after concluding the company represented a “major threat” and “crisis” for the $5.5bn-a-year egg industry, according to documents obtained by the Guardian.

In potential conflict with rules that govern how it can spend its funds, the American Egg Board (AEB) lobbied for a concerted attack on Hampton Creek, a food company that has created a low-cost plant-based egg replacement and the maker of Just Mayo, a mayonnaise alternative.

In a series of emails obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (Foia), AEB staff, a US department of agriculture official and egg industry executives attempted to orchestrate the attack.

The documents were obtained by Ryan Shapiro, a Foia expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Shapiro’s Washington DC-based Foia-specialist attorney, Jeffrey Light, and passed to Hampton Creek.

Among the efforts coordinated between the AEB, the USDA and the egg industry:

  • Outgoing AEB head Joanne Ivy advised Unilever on how to proceed against Hampton Creek after the food giant filed a false advertising lawsuit against its rival last year.
  • The Department of Agriculture’s national supervisor of shell eggs joined the AEB in its attack on Hampton Creek, suggesting Ivy contact the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directly about Just Mayo with her concerns. The FDA later ruled Just Mayo must change its name.
  • The AEB attempted to have Just Mayo blocked from Whole Foods, asking Anthony Zolezzi, a partner at private equity firm Pegasus Capital Advisors and self-described “eco-entrepreneur”, to use his influence with Whole Foods to drop the product. (Whole Foods still sells Just Mayo.)
  • More than one member of the AEB made joking threats of violence against Hampton Creek’s founder, Josh Tetrick. “Can we pool our money and put a hit on him?” asked Mike Sencer, executive vice-president of AEB member organization Hidden Villa Ranch. Mitch Kanter, executive vice-president of the AEB, jokingly offered “to contact some of my old buddies in Brooklyn to pay Mr. Tetrick a visit”.
  • The AEB’s research arm, the Egg Nutrition Center (ENC), tested the strength of Hampton Creek’s patent for its egg replacer, Beyond Eggs, using a consultant, Gilbert Leveille. Leveille concluded that the patent was “not very strong and could be easily challenged with an alternate product”, he said in an email to Kanter. “Were I in your position I would focus on nutritional quality and on the emerging science, much of which ENC has sponsored,” Leveille wrote.

The emails, totalling 600 pages, show the AEB has become deeply concerned about Hampton Creek. The San Francisco-based tech company has attracted $120m in funding from some of tech’s biggest names, including the Founders Fund, started by Facebook backer Peter Thiel, and Vinod Khosla’s Khosla Ventures.

The AEB represents egg farmers across the US and its board is selected by the secretary of agriculture. This year the politically connected AEB provided 14,000 eggs for the White House’s annual Easter egg roll and Ivy was photographed with President Barack Obama.

Article continues: