Al Jazeera journalists sentenced to three years in jail by Egyptian court – August 29, 2015 6:25AM ET Updated 9:39AM ET

Jailing of Baher Mohamed, Mohamed Fahmy, and Peter Greste a ‘death knell for freedom of expression,’ says Amnesty

Screen Shot 2015-08-30 at Aug 30, 2015 3.30

A court in Egypt has sentenced three Al Jazeera journalists to three years in jail after finding them guilty of “aiding a terrorist organization.”

Egyptian Baher Mohamed, Canadian Mohamed Fahmy and Australian Peter Greste were all handed three-year jail sentences when the court in Cairo delivered the verdict on Saturday, sparking worldwide condemnation of the decision.

Mohamed was sentenced to an additional six months for possession of a spent bullet casing. An appeal against the verdicts is planned.

Judge Hassan Farid, in his ruling, said he sentenced the men to prison because they had not registered with the country’s journalist syndicate.

He also said the men brought in equipment without security officials’ approval, had broadcast “false news” on Al Jazeera and used a hotel as a broadcasting point without permission. Following the sentence hearing, both Mohamed and Fahmy were escorted to Tora prison in southern Cairo, according to Egyptian media.

Article continues:

Vemma Nutrition shut down for running pyramid scheme – by Laura Rena Murray August 26, 2015 6:00PM ET

Screen Shot 2015-08-26 at Aug 26, 2015 3.07

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Wednesday announced that Vemma Nutrition — a multilevel marketing firm that relies on independent salespeople, called affiliates, to buy and sell its energy drinks, diet shakes and supplements — has been shut down for engaging in “deceptive and unlawful acts and practices.” The announcement followed an Aug. 17 suit filed against the company, in which the FTC accused it of operating as an illegal pyramid scheme.

In October, Al Jazeera exposed the company’s predatory practices and the lucrative lifestyle it afforded CEO Benson Keith Boreyko in a series about multilevel marketing firms. In the stories about Vemma, Al Jazeera detailed how the company rebranded itself to appeal to unsuspecting teens with its Young People Revolution, or YPR, movement. The stories unearthed information about his former company New Vision, which was also shut down by the FTC because of its claims that its supplements could cure attention deficit disorder. In 2011 he changed the name of New Vision International Holdings Inc. to Vemma International Holdings Inc.

“[The Al Jazeera report] was the only in-depth, extensive coverage of Vemma by mainstream media, which lent weight and force to the FTC’s investigation,” said Robert Fitzpatrick, who runs the watchdog website Pyramid Scheme Alert and was quoted in another story in the series about the psychology behind multilevel marketing firms.

Vemma was closed down for, among other things, using “interrelated companies that commingle funds and have common ownership, officers, directors and office locations,” according to the FTC lawsuit. This interconnecting company structure was initially documented by Al Jazeera in the 2014 exposé, which showed that Boreyko and his family incorporated dozens of interlocking companies that share addresses and list only Boreyko and his siblings as the principal shareholders, directors and officers.

Al Jazeera America found that CEO Benson Keith Boreyko made roughly $12 million in 2013 – 7,500 times more than three-quarters of Vemma affiliates.

The FTC investigation was aided by the offices of the attorney general in Arizona, South Carolina and Michigan as well the police department in Tempe, Arizona, where Vemma is headquartered.


Article continues:

One year after Michael Brown’s killing, his mother vows to ‘never forgive’ – by Tony Harris — August 5, 2015 9:45AM ET Updated 5:26PM ET & Philip J. Victor

Al Jazeera’s exclusive interview with Michael Brown’s mother 8:12

Al Jazeera’s exclusive interview with Michael Brown’s mother 8:12

The mother of Michael Brown says she will “never forgive” the “cold and malicious” police officer who shot and killed her son nearly one year ago in Ferguson, Missouri.

“He wouldn’t even admit what he did was wrong. He wouldn’t admit he had no reason to do what he did,” Lezley McSpadden said of former Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson. “I’ll never forgive him.”

McSpadden said of Wilson: “He’s evil, his acts were devilish.”

Wilson killed Brown on Aug. 9, 2014, after stopping him because he was walking in the street, not on the sidewalk. The killing of Brown, an unarmed black teen who, according to some accounts, had his hands in the air at the time of his death, by a white police officer sparked widespread protest and renewed debate over police targeting of black men.

McSpadden’s comments to Al Jazeera followed an interview with Wilson published by The New Yorker, in which he admitted that, aside from ongoing litigation brought by the Brown family, he seldom thought of the 18-year-old Brown.

“Do I think about who he was as a person? Not really, because it doesn’t matter at this point,” Wilson said, before adding that he believed Brown didn’t have a proper “upbringing.”

McSpadden responded to Wilson’s comments by saying the officer was the one who “didn’t have the right upbringing.”

“Because those are words that you just don’t use, especially after you took somebody’s life and you know you had no reason to,” she said. “But he can’t hurt me with his words. What he did last year hurt me really bad, so his words mean nothing to me.”

Wilson, who scuffled with Brown before the shooting, told authorities that he feared for his life during the confrontation and fired his gun in self-defense. Witnesses, however, contend that Brown was in a nonthreatening position when Wilson fired the fatal shots.

Article continues:

Invisible ‘data janitors’ mop up top websites behind the scenes – by Ned Resnikoff May 1, 2015 5:00AM ET

Amazon, Google, other large companies employ hidden workforce of low-wage content moderators

In the Philippines, a content moderator works at Task Us in Manila, on August, 2014. Moises Saman / Magnum Photos

In the Philippines, a content moderator works at Task Us in Manila, on August, 2014. Moises Saman / Magnum Photos

In “The Other Silicon Valley,” Al Jazeera takes a look at how California’s tech boom affects the working class. This is part one of a seven-part series.

Far behind the scenes at many of the world’s most popular websites, an invisible army is hard at work keeping content safe for the public. YouTube relies on them to screen all of their videos — some 300 hours of uploaded content every single minute — for pornography, hate speech, and other explicit, illegal, or offensive material. Amazon’s product recommendations are only partially automated; many are checked or manually selected by workers.Facebook uses them keep explicit content out of news feeds.

These content moderators range from full-time employees working out of Google’s headquarters in Mountain View California to subcontractors cloistered in Filipino office parks to freelancers scraping together a little extra money in the privacy of their own homes. Some of these digital freelancers find piecework through online labor markets such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, one of several “crowdsourcing” services that allow companies to tap into a global network of people who scrub their content, one assignment at a time.

They form the unseen backbone for much of the social web but are rarely acknowledged and often poorly paid. Lilly Irani, a professor at the University of California-San Diego described them in a recent essay on the website Public Books as “data janitors” who quietly scrub the social web free of vulgar material.

Irani and others who study the hidden world of content moderators say that their work has consequences far beyond the desire to shield our monitors from NSFW videos. They are asked to make implicit political decisions about what constitutes offensive or obscene content; and although they play a crucial role for companies that rely on user-generated content, their work is undervalued. The fact that they remain invisible means everyone else can indulge in the illusion that the Internet is a truly open, democratic forum for free expression and debate.

Article continues:

Activists launch ‘debt strike’ against college chain – February 23, 2015 10:00AM ET

The debt forgiveness movement born out of Occupy Wall Street has entered a new stage in its activism around student loans. On Monday, a wing of the campaign known as Debt Collective announced a “debt strike” by 15 former students of the for-profit college chain Corinthian Colleges Inc.

Screen Shot 2015-02-23 at Feb 23, 2015 8.04

The former students have said they will not repay any more of their student loans, in protest of what they describe as predatory lending practices on the part of both Corinthian Colleges and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE). Organizers working with Debt Collective said the coordinated action was a test run for larger debt refusal actions.

Debt Collective organizer Ann Larson compared the action to work stoppages conducted by the labor movement.

“This is the same kind of collective organizing,” she told Al Jazeera. “Collective bargaining can happen along economic lines when debtors join together.”

For their test case, Debt Collective selected a particularly ripe target: Corinthian Colleges has already been the subject of both state and federal investigations regarding its lending practices. Since June 2014 the company has been under tight financial supervision from the DOE, which is shepherding it through the process of selling off some of its campuses and shutting down others.

Ann Bowers, 54, one of the former Corinthian students who is refusing to pay down her loans, told Al Jazeera she owes between $30,000 and $40,000 after three years in the Everest College system, which is owned by Corinthian. She earned her associate degree at Everest and had completed her first year in on an online bachelor’s degree program when she found out that her school’s parent company was in trouble with the DOE.

“I asked them about transferring,” said Bowers, who lives in Fort Myers, Florida. “I went through the process with one school, and they didn’t accept all of my credits. And I found out Everest had taken six years of my lifetime funding [in federal loan eligibility] in three years. I was devastated.”

Bowers, who is disabled, said she has been unemployed for the year since she left Everest.

Article continues:

Freed Al Jazeera journalists reunited with family – Al Jazeera English 13 Feb 2015 09:17 GMT

Al Jazeera journalists Baher Mohamed and Mohamed Fahmy, who were held in Egypt for 411 days, were reunited with their families.

Their release on Friday came a day after an Egyptian court granted bail in the case against the journalists and said the next hearing would be on February 23.

Fahmy was asked by the judge to pay a security bond of around $33,000.

After Friday’s ruling, Jihan Rashid, Baher Mohamed’s wife, said: “I’m going immediately to tell the kids that their father is coming home today and that life will be beautiful. I’ll wait to welcome him back. Life has changed today.”

Adel Fahmy, Mohamed Fahmy’s brother, said: “We will play by the law we will abide by the Egyptian law and I am sure that he’s been vindicated by this, and will later be completely vindicated when this case falls apart.”

The judicial fight for Mohamed and Fahmy will continue until the charges are dropped.

Baher was initially sentenced to 10 years and Fahmy 7 years in prison. That decision was recently overturned.

Egypt’s highest court of appeals has challenged the evidence presented by the prosecution, saying the proceedings were flawed and ordered a retrial.

Earlier this, month another Al Jazeera journalist, Peter Greste, was deported to Australia after spending 400 days in detention.

Fahmy – who is an Egyptian-Canadian – was told by the authorities that his only way to freedom is to renounce his Egyptian citizenship, which he has done.

The three Al Jazeera journalists – Mohamed, Fahmy and Greste – were arrested in December 2013.

They were wrongly accused of promoting the banned Muslim brotherhood.

“The bail release is a small step in the right direction but this should have happened 411 days ago. There’s no evidence that they’ve been complicit with the Muslim Brotherhood; no evidence that they’ve been involved in terrorism,” Human Rights Lawyer Geoffrey Robertson said.