FBI Chief, Apple Lawyer Take Encryption Fight to Capitol Hill – By Devlin Barrett and  Daisuke Wakabayashi Updated March 1, 2016 6:43 p.m. ET


FBI director James Comey tells House Judiciary Committee the agency made a mistake in early days of San Bernadino probe

FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill on Tuesday.

FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. — PHOTO: JOSE LUIS MAGANA/ASSOCIATED PRESS

James Comey, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, on Tuesday conceded that a mistake was made in the early days of the investigation into the San Bernardino, Calif., terrorism attack, making it harder to get data from one of the shooters’ phones.

Mr. Comey said, however, that even without that error, the government would still need Apple Inc. ’s help to open the locked iPhone.

The FBI director’s discussion of the San Bernardino case came during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the issue of encryption—the subject of a major legal battle between the FBI and Apple about the company’s refusal to help investigators open a phone seized in the probe of the California shooting that left 14 dead in December.

The hearing created the unusual spectacle of Mr. Comey, one of the nation’s highest-ranking law-enforcement officers, squaring off against Bruce Sewell, the top lawyer for Apple, one of the world’s most visible technology companies. Mr. Comey testified first, followed by Mr. Sewell.

Article continues:

 

Congress’s Summer Fling With Marijuana – By JAMES HIGDON July 30, 2015


How Congress turned on the DEA and embraced weed.

It’s not easy being the DEA these days. After an unprecedented losing streak on Capitol Hill, the once-untouchable Drug Enforcement Administration suffered last week what might be considered the ultimate indignity: A Senate panel, for the first time, voted in favor of legal, recreational marijuana.

Last Thursday, the Appropriations Committee voted 16-14 on an amendment to allow marijuana businesses access to federal banking services, a landmark shift that will help states like Colorado, where pot is legal, fully integrate marijuana into their economies. As significant as the vote was—according to drug policy reform advocates, it marked the first time that either house of Congress has voted to advance legislation concerning legal marijuana—it’s only the latest vote in a remarkable run of success marijuana advocates have had this year on Capitol Hill.

“The amendment was a necessary response to an absurd regulatory morass,” Montana Sen. Steve Daines, one of the three Republicans to support Thursday’s amendment, tells Politico, referring to the multifaceted and complex system of laws that have been enacted over the past four decades to prosecute a war on marijuana. It’s a war that began on or about May 26, 1971, when President Richard Nixon told his chief of staff Bob Haldeman, “I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana …I mean one on marijuana that just tears the ass out of them.”

But that war appears to be winding down—potentially quickly. The summer of 2015 could be viewed historically as the tipping point against Nixon’s war on pot, the time when the DEA, a federal drug-fighting agency created by Nixon in 1973, found itself in unfamiliar territory as a target of congressional scrutiny, budget cuts and scorn. In a conference call this week, the new acting DEA administrator repeatedly downplayed marijuana enforcement efforts, saying that while he’s not exactly telling agents not to pursue marijuana cases, it’s generally not something anyone focuses on these days: “Typically it’s heroin, opioids, meth and cocaine in roughly that order and marijuana tends to come in at the back of the pack.”

What a difference a year makes.

 

Article continues:

Pentagon chief to push U.S. allies to ditch ‘Cold War playbook – BY PHIL STEWART Sun Jun 21, 2015 7:04am EDT


 U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter will urge NATO allies to “dispose of the Cold War playbook” during a trip to Europe this week, as the alliance adapts to a new kind of threat from Russia in the east and Islamic State to the south, U.S. officials said.
Article continues:

It’s Not Your Imagination: Congress Really Is Working More – By Gabrielle Levy April 21, 2015 | 12:01 a.m. EDT


Lawmakers are showing up to work more and doing more while they’re there, according to a new analysis.

This loving moment between Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Ben Cardin, D-Md. was brought to you by bipartisanship, which has been on a comparative upswing lately on Capitol Hill.

This loving moment between Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Ben Cardin, D-Md. was brought to you by bipartisanship, which has been on a comparative upswing lately on Capitol Hill.

Bipartisanship is breaking out on Capitol Hill, and it seems to be catching.

With the 114th Congress now settling into the new realities of the Republican majority, members are rediscovering what it’s like to work together across party lines toward concrete, achievable goals.

Last month’s breakthrough on a long-standing Medicare payment headachewas the most significant evidence yet that members of Congress had finally decided they’d had enough of the gridlock that has sent public disapproval soaring.

The No. 2 Republican in the Senate, John Cornyn, R-Texas, acknowledged the sea change after a vote in the upper chamber last week, calling the moment “great.”

“There’s just a huge pent-up demand to actually get something done, on both sides,” he told reporters after the Medicare “doc fix” passed the Senate, following approval in the House last month.

Republicans and Democrats have similarly found common ground on other high-profile issues. After weeks of negotiations between Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and newly elevated ranking member Ben Cardin, D-Md., the panel unanimously advanced a bill setting the parameters of congressional approval of a deal with Iran. A similar bipartisan spirit saw the Senate education committee approve an overhaul of the No Child Left Behind Act, offering a more permanent solution to the beleaguered 2002 law so universally disliked that 42 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have received waivers from some of its provisions.

Article continues:

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015/04/21/its-not-your-imagination-congress-really-is-working-more?int=a14709

Republican Congress moves into deal-making mode – By Scott Wong – 04/18/15 06:00 AM EDT


What ever happened to the do-nothing Congress?

Capitol Hill has seen a burst of bipartisan deal-making and legislating in recent days as newly empowered Republicans try to show voters they can govern responsibly when they’re in charge.

After a bumpy start, GOP leaders seem to have found their footing — passing a historic $200 billion Medicare reform package, striking big, bipartisan deals on Iran, education and trade, and preparing to pass a GOP budget for the first time in a decade.

Now comes the hard part: keeping the momentum.

Deadlines to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank’s charter, raise the federal borrowing limit, renew the Patriot Act and replenish the highway fund are fast-approaching, and none of the issues will be simple to sort out.

For now, GOP leaders are in a hopeful mood.

“There will be places we’re able to [come together]. There will be places that will divide us as well. But that’s part of the process of governing. Ideas flow,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told The Hill in a brief interview.

“There’s been some ups and there’s been some downs, and there’s been some very big successes,” he added.

Republicans entered the year under enormous pressure to show they can govern. For the first time in nearly a decade, the party hascontrol of the House and Senate. That gives them more ownership over Washington, and the party is eager to convince voters that their party should be given the keys to the White House in 2016.

Article continues:

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/239291-gop-congress-moves-into-deal-making-mode

Governors, senators set for 2016 GOP presidential primary brawl – By Peter Schroeder February 08, 2015, 06:00 am


The Republican presidential primary is shaping up to be a battle between the statehouse and the statesmen.

Current and former governors such as Jeb Bush (Fla.), Scott Walker (Wis.) and Chris Christie (N.J.) are touting their hands-on experience outside of Washington as a major asset against Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee.

But those eyeing the White House from Capitol Hill are punching back, dismissing the argument that being from outside D.C. is better.

“I’m always amused when it is treated as news that governors think that governors make better candidates,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told The Hill on Thursday.

“What America faces is not a management problem, it’s a leadership problem,” argued Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), who recently threw his name into the mix as a presidential contender.

The notion that the executive experience governors get on the job is an asset in the White House is nothing new. But a crowded GOP field pulling talent from governors’ mansions and the halls of the Senate has jumpstarted that debate ahead of 2016.

With public approval of Washington policymakers cratering and legislative achievements on Capitol Hill hard to come by, governors see a solid opportunity to bolster their outsider bona fides and slam would-be competitors in the process.

Former Texas Gov. Ricky Perry has been aggressive in dismissing senatorial experience a White House selling point, saying earlier this month that “governors have to make choices…senators talk.”

Even governors who once rubbed shoulders as Washington lawmakers are quick to argue voters should look outside D.C. for presidential picks.

Article continues:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/232074-governors-senators-set-for-2016-brawl

Republicans eye obscure budget tool to repeal ObamaCare – By Scott Wong – 12/21/14 05:00 PM EST


Getty Images 

Republicans on and off Capitol Hill are rallying behind using a rarely-deployed budget tool next year to dismantle ObamaCare.

But the issue of how to use “budget reconciliation” has divided Republicans, with some calling for it to be implemented to overhaul the tax code or to push through major energy reforms.

The tool is useful because it could allownewly-empowered Senate Republicans to pass legislation with a 51-vote simple majority rather than the usual 60, greatly increasing the chances of moving legislation to President Obama’s desk.And while Obama is certain to veto anything that tries to roll back his landmark healthcare law, Republicans increasingly see reconciliation as an important messaging tool to help paint a contrast with Democrats on Obamacare ahead of 2016.

“My guidance is that’s where members are headed,” said one senior Senate Republican aide familiar with the behind-the-scenes budget discussions.

There already appears to be strong bipartisan support to undo smaller pieces of Obamacare — things like restoring the 40-hour workweek and repealing the medical device tax — so those provisions wouldn’t require the filibuster-proof budget tool.

While Democrats will certainly have more leverage if they retain the ability to use the Senate’s filibuster, Republicans think they can work across the aisle to enact legislation on taxes and energy.

If Republicans are serious about enacting tax reform next year, they should aim for 60 Senate votes, said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office who leads the conservative think tank American Action Forum. Republicans will hold 54 seats come January, so they they’d need at least six Democratic votes.

Ted Cruz reignites GOP civil war By Manu Raju and Burgess Everett 12/16/14 5:32 AM EST


Republican senators pounded Ted Cruz over the weekend, lashing him for his procedural tactics and ultimately voting in large numbers against his immigration gambit.

Now, Cruz’s allies off Capitol Hill are looking for revenge.

Conservative outside groups view Saturday’s vote as the first salvo in the GOP v. GOP purity wars that they hope to reignite in the beginning of the new Congress and in the run-up to the 2016 Senate midterms, when 24 Republican senators will be on the primary ballots.

After being pummeled by the party establishment in the 2014 midterms, activist groups are looking at the fight over Cruz’s contention that the spending bill is unconstitutional as their first opportunity to regroup and reestablish their relevance as Senate Republicans prepare to take the majority next year.

“People’s votes may by themselves inspire folks to say: ‘I’m running against this guy or this girl,’” said Ken Cuccinelli, the president of the Senate Conservatives Fund. “I have a funny feeling that some people who weren’t thinking of running two weeks ago are thinking of running now.”

Seven of the 20 Republicans who voted against Cruz are up for reelection in two years, including Sens. Dan Coats of Indiana, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Lisa Murkowksi of Alaska. And 16 Republicans who are running again, such as Richard Burr of North Carolina and Rob Portman of Ohio, joined the Texas freshman, a sign that many are well aware of ammunition that could be used against them in a GOP primary.

In an interview Monday, Cruz was unapologetic, pointing out that “just about every senator up for reelection in 2016” voted with him, saying he would battle his party’s leadership in February if it does not take a firmer line when Homeland Security Department funding lapses.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/ted-cruz-gop-civil-war-113592.html#ixzz3M3eRGnZG

Liberals: Obama abandoned us – By Edward-Isaac Dovere and Burgess Everett 12/11/14 6:09 PM EST Updated 12/11/14 10:05 PM EST


The White House’s aggressive push to salvage a spending bill on Capitol Hill left liberal lawmakers feeling burned by President Barack Obama — and raised significant doubts about their desire to cooperate heading into next year’s Republican takeover of Congress.

Democrats will need every vote they can muster next year as the GOP plans to attack liberal priorities on health care, energy and financial regulation in 2015. But Thursday’s deadline drama offered no signal of party unity, only fresh reminders of the post-election divisions between a president who’s looking to govern during his last two years in office and a newly invigorated populist wing of the party, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

The $1.1 trillion spending bill passed the House late Thursday, with 57 Democrats voting for the bill while 139 voted against it — with many liberals seething over a provision that rolled back a key financial regulation that is part of the Dodd-Frank law.

“A vote for this bill is a vote for future taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street,” Warren said Thursday. “It is time for all of us to stand up and fight.”

Obama and Biden dialed for votes all day, and dispatched Obama Chief of Staff Denis McDonough to meet with House Democrats, hoping to sooth Democrats’ concerns over policy riders that showed up in the trillion-dollar spending bill and were blasted by liberal stalwarts Warren and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

While the eleventh-hour intervention may have pushed the bill across the finish line, it also sparked a fresh round of finger-pointing among Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the White House. For the increasingly liberal factions of Democrats on Capitol Hill, the White House’s work was too little, too late.

“I do not share the White House’s view,” said Rep. Steve Israel of New York, a member of Democratic leadership after meeting with McDonough.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/liberals-obama-abandoned-us-113516.html#ixzz3LeYuMbUd

What happened to Miriam Carey? – Written by David Montgomery Published on November 26, 2014


Screen Shot 2014-11-28 at Nov 28, 2014 10.29

“We want to know: Why? What happened?”

So many questions, so much we still don’t know about the case of the woman shot to death by the Secret Service and the U.S. Capitol Police on Oct. 3, 2013, after a car chase from the White House to Capitol Hill. Her 13-month-old daughter survived in a car seat.

“Did we miss something?”

Barbara Nicholson is asking. The office manager of a dental practice in Ardsley, N.Y., is standing in the hygiene room, remembering the woman who used to clean teeth at this chair. Miriam Iris Carey — that was her name. She was one of the best dental hygienists and “one of the nicest people” Nicholson ever hired.

“We’re left with a void and no answers,” Nicholson says. “It’s like she was wiped off the face of the earth.

Nicholson’s voice catches. She pauses and looks away. “She’s missed. She’s very missed.”

Do you remember Miriam Carey? Her remarkably public death at 34 mesmerized us for a couple of news cycles. Then we moved on pretty quickly. I had to look up her name when I first started puzzling over this case. The main thing I remembered was that incredible video — the one showing the two-door black Infiniti surrounded by Secret Service officers with guns drawn near the Capitol Reflecting Pool. The car looks trapped. Suddenly the driver backs into a squad car and accelerates away. There’s the sound of gunfire while tourists take cover on the West Lawn. The Infiniti reappears, making a loop around a traffic circle, and proceeds up Constitution Avenue to what would be the fatal encounter outside the Hart Building.

What an afternoon. We were told that Carey “rammed” White House and Capitol “barriers.” That she tried to breach two security perimeters. That she had mental problems.

District Police Chief Cathy Lanier said federal officers acted “heroically.” The House of Representatives offered a standing ovation.

It was easy to call this a tragedy and turn the page.

Except that some of what little we thought we knew hasn’t held up. The part about ramming White House barriers and trying to breach two security perimeters? Not exactly true.