What WikiLeaks Really Revealed About the CIA’s Spying Techniques – By Paul Sonne March 11, 2017 7:00 a.m. ET


Documents don’t support contention that CIA impersonates other countries to mask provenance of its cyberattacks

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said he has additional information about ways the CIA tries to mask its attacks.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said he has additional information about ways the CIA tries to mask its attacks. Photo: Dominic Lipinski/Zuma Press

WASHINGTON—The “Vault 7” trove of documents released Tuesday by WikiLeakshas been cited by commentators to claim that the Central Intelligence Agency may have been masquerading as other foreign states while conducting its cyberhacks.

The documents being cited, however, offer no smoking gun.

The idea that the CIA posed as foreign actors has gained currency among people who are using the WikiLeaks disclosure to question the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman last year in order to help elect President Donald Trump. These political commentators and outlets are implying the campaign hacks could have been a CIA operation.

“CIA uses techniques to make cyberattacks look like they originated from enemy state. It turns DNC/Russia hack allegation by CIA into a JOKE,” internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom​ wrote after the release in a tweet picked up by ZeroHedge, a financial blog known for its antiestablishment worldview. Mr. Dotcom, who founded the file-sharing website Megaupload, is wanted in the U.S. on charges including criminal copyright infringement, money laundering and conspiracy to commit racketeering.

Article continues:

Spies Keep Intelligence From Donald Trump on Leak Concerns – By  Shane Harris and  Carol E. Lee Updated Feb. 16, 2017 12:33 a.m. ET


Decision to withhold information underscores deep mistrust between intelligence community and president

President Donald Trump speaking at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., on Jan. 21.

President Donald Trump speaking at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., on Jan. 21. Photo: Olivier Doulier/Press Pool

U.S. intelligence officials have withheld sensitive intelligence from President Donald Trump because they are concerned it could be leaked or compromised, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.

The officials’ decision to keep information from Mr. Trump underscores the deep mistrust that has developed between the intelligence community and the president over his team’s contacts with the Russian government, as well as the enmity he has shown toward U.S. spy agencies. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump accused the agencies of leaking information to undermine him.

In some of these cases of withheld information, officials have decided not to show Mr. Trump the sources and methods that the intelligence agencies use to collect information, the current and former officials said. Those sources and methods could include, for instance, the means that an agency uses to spy on a foreign government.

A White House official said: “There is nothing that leads us to believe that this is an accurate account of what is actually happening.”

Article continues:

The Rise Of The Drone, And The Thorny Questions That Have Followed – TOM BOWMAN September 8, 20164:56 AM ET


15 YEARS LATER: THE SEPT. 11 TERRORIST ATTACKS

A U.S. Predator drone on the tarmac at the Kandahar military airport in southern Afghanistan in 2010. The U.S. has been using drones more and more frequently since the Sept. 11 attacks. They have been highly effective on the battlefield, but have raised legal and ethical issues. Massoud Hossaini /AP

Today in the skies over New Mexico, Air Force students are practicing for the kill.

They sit at terminals at Holloman Air Force base, watching grainy images from a drone video feed. Thousands of feet below, at a desert training range, role players portray civilians and fighters inside a village. The students must find the proper target, then with a push of a button, they unleash a simulated airstrike.

This new world of aerial combat began in the early morning hours of Oct. 7, 2001. Air Force Lt. Gen. Dave Deptula was inside a Saudi Arabia command center, also watching a drone video. It showed Taliban leader Mullah Omar and his top aides outside Kandahar, Afghanistan.

“They left a compound and then they move into a series of very small adobe huts,” recalls Deptula.

The U.S. decided not to use a 1,000-pound bomb to destroy the buildings, and potentially kill innocents..

Article continues:

 

Former CIA head Michael Hayden on why he won’t endorse Trump or Clinton – Vice News Published on Aug 23, 2016


On August 15, General Michael Hayden, the former head of the CIA and NSA, said Donald Trump has “autocrat envy.” Hayden was one of 50 officials from past Republican administrations who signed a letter labeling Donald Trump a risk to America’s “national security and well-being.”

VICE News’ Michael Moynihan sat down with Hayden shortly after Donald Trump gave his first major policy speech about national security and counter-terrorism.

Gawker Dies So Its Journalism Can Live – HARRY SIEGEL 05.27.16 9:10 PM ET


It remains unclear whether the collection of biting websites making up Gawker Media will survive, but its effects on journalism cannot be denied.

The Platonic ideal of a Gawker story is getting told in the New York Times, and in the Gawker style. And that weird sort of moral victory could end up being the site’s last stand.

You know, the story where the network of websites including the flagship scandal sheet (now 20% nicer, with 50% less web traffic) that long relished publishing what others wouldn’t is on the verge of being sued out of existence by a professional wrestler with a creepy sex life who, it turns out, is backed in that suit by an immortality-craving, gay Silicon Valley billionaire who helped found the CIA-backed spooky-as-hell “data analysis” company Palantir and who called the nasty New York media operation “terrorists” after they reported nastily on him and his West Coast friends a decade back. That’s not to mention the part where the rival billionaire with his own CIA ties who basically purchased the Snowden archives for his own vanity media company stepped up Friday to support Gawker’s potentially crippling legal expenses as it appeals a Florida court’s decision that it owes Hogan $140 million, and maybe ends up owning Gawker when all’s said and done.

Anyways, it’s a hell of a story, one that would be right up Gawker’s alley if it wasn’t a player in it and maybe on the verge of getting destroyed or mangled beyond all recognition by it, depending on how the judges and billionaires decide things from here for the site dedicated to taking the piss out of just such types.

Article continues:

White House Will Reveal How Many People the U.S. Has Killed With Drones – by Clay Dillow MARCH 7, 2016, 4:12 PM EST


A breakdown of terrorist and civilian deaths.

A breakdown of terrorist and civilian deaths.

A senior White House aide said Monday that the White House will soon disclose how many terrorism suspects the U.S. has killed via drone strikes since President Obama took office, marking the first such disclosure surrounding the controversial program.

Lisa Monaco, a counter-terrorism and homeland security adviser to President Obama, said in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations Monday that the increased transparency will help shore up public support for the administration’s use of lethal drone strikes. While there’s no set date for the release of the data—which tallies drone deaths going back to 2009—it will happen in the “coming weeks.”

“Not only is greater transparency the right thing to do, it is the best way to maintain the legitimacy of our counter-terrorism actions and the broad support of our allies,” Monaco said. She also noted that the report will continue annually, though with less than a year left in office, it remains unclear if the next administration will continue the practice.

Subscribe to Data SheetFortune’s daily newsletter about the business of technology.

Official data surrounding the use of lethal drone strikes by the U.S. Air Force and the C.I.A. has been virtually non-existent in the years since the attacks of September 11, 2001 when drone strikes became an accepted and now often common method of striking at terrorism suspects abroad. Human rights groups have long called for two U.S. administrations to release more data about the drone program, including how decisions are made with respect to approving targets and how many civilians have been killed as a consequence of the strikes.

Article continues: